FPGA Central

Hi,

I wish to generate a frequency of approx 400 Hz using Xilinx
Spartan II(200 MHz)and send the 1 bit signal to a speaker output and
hope to hear some noise.
My VHDL code, tested on PeakVHDL simulator does generate the
waveform and is pasted at the far bottom. The problem is that the code
does not compile on Xilinx because "WAIT for 2.5 ns" is not supported
on Xilinx Spartan II for a process. What would be the simplest way out
to generate 400 approx Hz on a Xilinx 200MHz device? I have used
200MHz/(2 to the power of 19) = 382 Hz approx. (Use MSB of 19 bits of
STD_LOGIC_VECTOR)

Another thing which has confused me is: If I wish to write an
entity(below) for Spartan II, does the programmer worry about
generating the signal for "clk" input? Or simply connect it to the
correct pin of FPGA and I should get the signal of 200MHz?


ENTITY some_entity IS
PORT (clk : IN BIT);
END some_entity;

For my code tested on PeakVHDL, I have generated the 200MHz signal
using a test bed(music_tester) and then modified it to 400Hz.

I apologise if the question is basic.

Thanks in advance





ENTITY music_tester IS
PORT (clk : OUT STD_LOGIC; freq : IN STD_LOGIC);
END music_tester;

ARCHITECTURE behavioral OF music_tester IS
BEGIN
process
BEGIN
clk <= '1';
-- 200MHz is 5ns cycle
WAIT FOR 2.5 ns;
clk <= '0';
WAIT FOR 2.5 ns;
END process;
END behavioral;

ENTITY music1 IS
PORT (clk : IN STD_LOGIC; pinout : OUT STD_LOGIC);
END music1;

ARCHITECTURE music1_structure OF music1 IS
BEGIN

PROCESS(clk)
VARIABLE counter : STD_LOGIC_VECTOR(18 DOWNTO 0) :=
conv_std_logic_vector(0, 19);
VARIABLE Aint : INTEGER RANGE 0 TO 524287 := 0; -- 19 bits

BEGIN
IF RISING_EDGE(clk) THEN
counter := conv_std_logic_vector(Aint, 19);
Aint := Aint + 1;
-- Divide 200 Mhz/(2*2*2...19
times)
-- MSB has approx 382Hz
pinout <= counter(18);
END IF;
END process;
END music1_structure;

ENTITY testbench IS
END testbench;

ARCHITECTURE structure OF testbench IS
COMPONENT music_tester PORT (clk : OUT STD_LOGIC; freq : IN
STD_LOGIC); END COMPONENT;
COMPONENT music1 PORT (clk : IN STD_LOGIC; pinout : OUT STD_LOGIC);
END COMPONENT;
SIGNAL a, b :STD_LOGIC;
BEGIN
tester: music_tester PORT MAP(a, b);
UUT: music1 PORT MAP(a, b);
END structure;

"Rakesh Sharma" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected] om...
> Hi,
>
> I wish to generate a frequency of approx 400 Hz using Xilinx
> Spartan II(200 MHz)and send the 1 bit signal to a speaker output and
> hope to hear some noise.
> My VHDL code, tested on PeakVHDL simulator does generate the
> waveform and is pasted at the far bottom. The problem is that the code
> does not compile on Xilinx because "WAIT for 2.5 ns" is not supported
> on Xilinx Spartan II for a process. What would be the simplest way out
> to generate 400 approx Hz on a Xilinx 200MHz device? I have used
> 200MHz/(2 to the power of 19) = 382 Hz approx. (Use MSB of 19 bits of
> STD_LOGIC_VECTOR)

The "WAIT..." statement is not synthesisable. You simply need a counter
(ripple counter will do) to divide the clock down to 400 Hz or so. Write the
VHDL for a toggle flip-flop and string lots of them together - not very
elegant but it should work.

Leon

Hi

> Another thing which has confused me is: If I wish to write an
> entity(below) for Spartan II, does the programmer worry about
> generating the signal for "clk" input? Or simply connect it to the
> correct pin of FPGA and I should get the signal of 200MHz?

I'm not sure I understand the question but :

The CLK input MUST be provided by external means like a Crystal Oscillator and must be directed
to an appropriate pin on the FPGA.

Then you must use constrainsts so that your VHDL nets that should be connected to the outside are
locked onto the right pads of the FPGA (depends on your board design).


Sylvain

In article <[email protected]>,
Leon Heller <[email protected]> wrote:
>The "WAIT..." statement is not synthesisable. You simply need a counter
>(ripple counter will do) to divide the clock down to 400 Hz or so. Write the
>VHDL for a toggle flip-flop and string lots of them together - not very
>elegant but it should work.

I know XST will infer a counter from

reg [31:0] ctr
always @(posedge clk)
begin
reg = reg + 1
end

Far easier than stringing flops to get a binary countdown.

--
Nicholas C. Weaver. to reply email to "nweaver" at the domain
icsi.berkeley.edu

The best solution is to use a phase accumulator (aka Direct Digital Synthesis). All
that is is a fancy name for an accumulator that adds a fixed increment value to itself
on every clock cycle. The MSB of the accumulator is the clock output, and the output
frequency is related to the master clock frequency by:

fo = fc*n/(2^k)

where:
fo = output frquency
fc = master clock frequency
n = increment value (integer)
k = number of bits in accumulator.

For example, you have a 200 MHz master clock, and you need the output to be 400 Hz.
Lets say we use an 32 bit accumulator, so n = 400/200M * (2^32) = 8589.9, which rounded
is 8590. Plugging that back in, you have an output frequency of 400.003 Hz. The
number of bits in the accumulator sets the resolution of the frequency setting you can
have. The output will have a maximum jitter of +/- 1/2 clock period of the master
clock.

The circuit is just an accumulator that always adds the constant n to itself. This
works by taking advantage modulo arithmetic. Basically , you keep accumulating the
fractional part and throwing away the integer part of the accumulated sum. Each time
the sum crosses over to the next integer, the integer part is dropped.


Rakesh Sharma wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I wish to generate a frequency of approx 400 Hz using Xilinx
> Spartan II(200 MHz)and send the 1 bit signal to a speaker output and
> hope to hear some noise.
> My VHDL code, tested on PeakVHDL simulator does generate the
> waveform and is pasted at the far bottom. The problem is that the code
> does not compile on Xilinx because "WAIT for 2.5 ns" is not supported
> on Xilinx Spartan II for a process. What would be the simplest way out
> to generate 400 approx Hz on a Xilinx 200MHz device? I have used
> 200MHz/(2 to the power of 19) = 382 Hz approx. (Use MSB of 19 bits of
> STD_LOGIC_VECTOR)
>
> Another thing which has confused me is: If I wish to write an
> entity(below) for Spartan II, does the programmer worry about
> generating the signal for "clk" input? Or simply connect it to the
> correct pin of FPGA and I should get the signal of 200MHz?
>
> ENTITY some_entity IS
> PORT (clk : IN BIT);
> END some_entity;
>
> For my code tested on PeakVHDL, I have generated the 200MHz signal
> using a test bed(music_tester) and then modified it to 400Hz.
>
> I apologise if the question is basic.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> ENTITY music_tester IS
> PORT (clk : OUT STD_LOGIC; freq : IN STD_LOGIC);
> END music_tester;
>
> ARCHITECTURE behavioral OF music_tester IS
> BEGIN
> process
> BEGIN
> clk <= '1';
> -- 200MHz is 5ns cycle
> WAIT FOR 2.5 ns;
> clk <= '0';
> WAIT FOR 2.5 ns;
> END process;
> END behavioral;
>
> ENTITY music1 IS
> PORT (clk : IN STD_LOGIC; pinout : OUT STD_LOGIC);
> END music1;
>
> ARCHITECTURE music1_structure OF music1 IS
> BEGIN
>
> PROCESS(clk)
> VARIABLE counter : STD_LOGIC_VECTOR(18 DOWNTO 0) :=
> conv_std_logic_vector(0, 19);
> VARIABLE Aint : INTEGER RANGE 0 TO 524287 := 0; -- 19 bits
>
> BEGIN
> IF RISING_EDGE(clk) THEN
> counter := conv_std_logic_vector(Aint, 19);
> Aint := Aint + 1;
> -- Divide 200 Mhz/(2*2*2...19
> times)
> -- MSB has approx 382Hz
> pinout <= counter(18);
> END IF;
> END process;
> END music1_structure;
>
> ENTITY testbench IS
> END testbench;
>
> ARCHITECTURE structure OF testbench IS
> COMPONENT music_tester PORT (clk : OUT STD_LOGIC; freq : IN
> STD_LOGIC); END COMPONENT;
> COMPONENT music1 PORT (clk : IN STD_LOGIC; pinout : OUT STD_LOGIC);
> END COMPONENT;
> SIGNAL a, b :STD_LOGIC;
> BEGIN
> tester: music_tester PORT MAP(a, b);
> UUT: music1 PORT MAP(a, b);
> END structure;

--
--Ray Andraka, P.E.
President, the Andraka Consulting Group, Inc.
401/884-7930 Fax 401/884-7950
email [email protected]
http://www.andraka.com

"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, 1759