View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-24-2006, 06:57 AM
Daniel O'Connor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: windrvr for Linux broken in 2.6.16

[email protected]d wrote:
> Rapid changes in kernel interface is something that is avoided within bsd
> operating systems (freebsd, netbsd, openbsd) due more conservative code
> acceptence policy.. Should jungo.com ever try it


I'd just prefer Xilinx publish the code for cableserver and standardise all
their tools to use it.

There's no reason all this could be done in userland (ppdev) and have
maximum compatibility (and trivial portability).

For faster performance you could write a driver (with source which
bundled together JTAG ops or something.. Even pure userland is not terribly
slow (I have an XC3/XCF programmer which is not much slower than impact)

I'm sure you're all sick of me mentioning this by now of course 8-)

--
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
-- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
Reply With Quote