On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:55:03 +0100, Brian Drummond wrote:
>And, of course, 6 * 9 = 13#42#
But if everything is answered, what's the point of Usenet?
Seriously OT: I've known that relationship for some time,
but I've never seen any evidence to say whether or not
Douglas Adams did it deliberately - I had always assumed
he was far too smart for it to be an accident, but...
do you have any references for that?
OT2: How many examples are there of digit-strings N, M
such that M /= N and N#M# = M#N# ???
--
Jonathan Bromley, Consultant
On Jul 11, 1:13 am, Tricky <Trickyh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > OT2: How many examples are there of digit-strings N, M
> > such that M /= N and N#M# = M#N# ???
> > --
>
> off the top of my head:
>
> 10#2# = 2#10 = 2
> 10#3# = 3#10 = 3
> etc, forever
> (1#10# is not a legal representation)
>
> also, any combination of 11-19, eg 11#19 = 19#11, 13#16#
>
> After this, differences gradually diverge, eg
> 11#20# = 22, 20#11# = 21 diff = 1
> 11#21# = 23, 21#11# = 22 diff = 1
> ....
> 12#20# = 24, 20#12# = 22 diff = 2
> 12#21# = 25, 21#12# = 23 diff = 2
> .....
> etc
>
> so assuming thats all of them, then 56 + (infinity: 10#N#, N#10# where
> N /= 0, 1 or 10)
>
Not in VHDL:
13.4.2 Based literals
A based literal is an abstract literal expressed in a form that
specifies the base explicitly. The base must be at least two and at
most sixteen.
On Jul 11, 1:13 am, Tricky <Trickyh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > OT2: How many examples are there of digit-strings N, M
> > such that M /= N and N#M# = M#N# ???
> > --
>
> off the top of my head:
>
> 10#2# = 2#10 = 2
> 10#3# = 3#10 = 3
> etc, forever
> (1#10# is not a legal representation)
>
> also, any combination of 11-19, eg 11#19 = 19#11, 13#16#
>
> After this, differences gradually diverge, eg
> 11#20# = 22, 20#11# = 21 diff = 1
> 11#21# = 23, 21#11# = 22 diff = 1
> ....
> 12#20# = 24, 20#12# = 22 diff = 2
> 12#21# = 25, 21#12# = 23 diff = 2
> .....
> etc
>
> so assuming thats all of them, then 56 + (infinity: 10#N#, N#10# where
> N /= 0, 1 or 10)
>
> I really ought to get back to work.
Not in VHDL:
13.4.2 Based literals
A based literal is an abstract literal expressed in a form that
specifies the base explicitly. The base must be at least two and at
most sixteen.
"diogratia" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Jul 11, 1:13 am, Tricky <Trickyh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > OT2: How many examples are there of digit-strings N, M
>> > such that M /= N and N#M# = M#N# ???
>> > --
>>
>> off the top of my head:
>>
>> 10#2# = 2#10 = 2
>> 10#3# = 3#10 = 3
>> etc, forever
>> (1#10# is not a legal representation)
>>
>> also, any combination of 11-19, eg 11#19 = 19#11, 13#16#
>>
>> After this, differences gradually diverge, eg
>> 11#20# = 22, 20#11# = 21 diff = 1
>> 11#21# = 23, 21#11# = 22 diff = 1
>> ....
>> 12#20# = 24, 20#12# = 22 diff = 2
>> 12#21# = 25, 21#12# = 23 diff = 2
>> .....
>> etc
>>
>> so assuming thats all of them, then 56 + (infinity: 10#N#, N#10# where
>> N /= 0, 1 or 10)
>>
> Not in VHDL:
>
> 13.4.2 Based literals
>
> A based literal is an abstract literal expressed in a form that
> specifies the base explicitly. The base must be at least two and at
> most sixteen.
On Jul 12, 4:36 pm, "MikeWhy" <boat042-nos...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "diogratia" <diogra...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> > On Jul 11, 1:13 am, Tricky <Trickyh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > OT2: How many examples are there of digit-strings N, M
> >> > such that M /= N and N#M# = M#N# ???
> >> > --
>
> > Not in VHDL:
>
> > 13.4.2 Based literals
>
> > A based literal is an abstract literal expressed in a form that
> > specifies the base explicitly. The base must be at least two and at
> > most sixteen.
>
> The muse posed stipulated M /= N.
With based literals comprised of base and based integers substituted
appropriately for N and M in the expression described by:
N#M# = M#N#
e.g.:
2#10# = 10#2#
M is limited by the right hand based literal and N is limited by the
left hand based literal by acceptable values of the base. The base in
the domain 'at least two and at most sixteen'.
> On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:55:03 +0100, Brian Drummond wrote:
>
> >And, of course, 6 * 9 = 13#42#
>
> But if everything is answered, what's the point of Usenet?
>
> Seriously OT: I've known that relationship for some time,
> but I've never seen any evidence to say whether or not
> Douglas Adams did it deliberately - I had always assumed
> he was far too smart for it to be an accident, but...
> do you have any references for that?
łnobody writes jokes in base 13, I may be a pretty sad person but I
donąt write jokes in base 13.˛
-- Douglas Adams.
--
David M. Palmer [email protected] (formerly @clark.net, @ematic.com)