FPGA Central - World's 1st FPGA / CPLD Portal

FPGA Central

World's 1st FPGA Portal

 

Go Back   FPGA Groups > Mailing List > si-list

si-list si-list mailer

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2009, 09:27 PM
Daniel Bauer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default [SI-LIST] trace width working as a plane

Hello,

could you tell me if there`s an rule of thumb at which width of the trace, the trace is working as a plane depending on the signal frequency?

For example: the width of the trace for a signal-frequency 500kHz must be 0.15mm to get a 100 ohm impedance. If the width of the trace gets bigger, the impedance gets smaller -> you will get more radiation (no exact impedance matching).

But what will happen when the width of the trace gets more and more bigger....? At which point will the "trace width" work as plane and how do I have to calculate the correct impedance of this plane (microstrip calculator do not work with such width of trace)? Are there any kind of formulas?

best regards
Daniel

__________________________________________________ __________________
Psssst! Schon vom neuen WEB.DE MultiMessenger gehört?
Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.produkte.web.de/messenger/?did=3123

------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request (AT) freelists (DOT) org with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request (AT) freelists (DOT) org with 'help' in the Subject field


List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.net

List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2009, 09:54 PM
Zabinski, Patrick
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default [SI-LIST] Re: trace width working as a plane

Daniel,

The answer is dependent on your definition of "work as a plane."

My assumption, though, is that the transition from "working like a
transmission line"
to "working like a plane" is when the mode of signal propagation
transitions from transverse electromagnetic (TEM) to one of the
evanescent TE or TM modes. I forget the mode enumeration, but the first
evanescent mode of an infinitely long uniform stripline occurs when the
width of the trace approaches that of half-wavelength in the dielectric.
At this point, the electric field potential varies across the width of
the trace, and signals no longer adhere to TEM mode.

For example, a stripline in FR-4 with a relative permittivity of 4.0
will have a half-wavelength at 1 GHz of about 75 mm (3 inches). In
other words, striplines at 1 GHz need to be approaching 75 mm in width
before these modes prevail.

The relationship is inversely proportional. So, higher frequencies
imply narrower traces. e.g., 10 GHz equates to 7.5 mm (.3 inches).

Keep in mind, however, other issues can come up when you use very-wide
traces, and it is not recommended to come anywhere near these widths.
The above is simply a first-order theoretical limit, and other
second-/third-order issues can creep up long before this limit. For
example, if the dielectric thicknesses approach half-wavelength, other
modes will be propagated. Also, adjacent structures can excite yet
different modes. The moral of the story is to stay far away from
evanescent modes.

Good luck,
Pat Zabinski
Mayo Clinic




>
> Hello,
>
> could you tell me if there`s an rule of thumb at which width
> of the trace, the trace is working as a plane depending on
> the signal frequency?
>
> For example: the width of the trace for a signal-frequency
> 500kHz must be 0.15mm to get a 100 ohm impedance. If the
> width of the trace gets bigger, the impedance gets smaller ->
> you will get more radiation (no exact impedance matching).
>
> But what will happen when the width of the trace gets more
> and more bigger....? At which point will the "trace width"
> work as plane and how do I have to calculate the correct
> impedance of this plane (microstrip calculator do not work
> with such width of trace)? Are there any kind of formulas?
>
> best regards
> Daniel
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request (AT) freelists (DOT) org with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request (AT) freelists (DOT) org with 'help' in the Subject field


List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.net

List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SI-LIST] PCB ground plane topology and IC damage Doug Smith si-list 0 02-08-2009 04:22 AM
Split Plane maxascent FPGA 32 01-08-2008 11:43 PM
z plane design quantumonkey DSP 0 12-04-2005 03:00 PM
z plane design student DSP 3 12-04-2005 06:02 AM
wish list - register width specification Robert Finch Verilog 3 09-08-2005 04:02 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright 2008 @ FPGA Central. All rights reserved