FPGA Central - World's 1st FPGA / CPLD Portal

FPGA Central

World's 1st FPGA Portal

 

Go Back   FPGA Groups > NewsGroup > DSP

DSP comp.dsp newsgroup, mailing list

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-30-2004, 09:17 AM
lucy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default question about lowest sampling rate...

Hi all,

Suppose x(t) has bandwith bandlimited in [-B, B]... so the lowest sampling
rate for x(t) is Fs=2B...

Does this matter when x(t) is real or complex-valued?

Moreover, for (x(t))^2, the bandwidth is [-2B, 2B], the lowest Fs=4B no
matter when x(t) is real or complex-valued. Am I right?

More interestingly, for (x(t))^3, the bandwidth is [-3B, 3B], but we can
still use Fs=2B(the same as x(t))... if x(t) is real-valued... Am I right?
Does this result hold if x(t) is complex-valued?

Thanks a lot!

-L


Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-30-2004, 10:37 AM
Jeroen Boschma
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: question about lowest sampling rate...



lucy wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Suppose x(t) has bandwith bandlimited in [-B, B]... so the lowest sampling
> rate for x(t) is Fs=2B...
>
> Does this matter when x(t) is real or complex-valued?
>
> Moreover, for (x(t))^2, the bandwidth is [-2B, 2B], the lowest Fs=4B no
> matter when x(t) is real or complex-valued. Am I right?
>
> More interestingly, for (x(t))^3, the bandwidth is [-3B, 3B], but we can
> still use Fs=2B(the same as x(t))... if x(t) is real-valued... Am I right?
> Does this result hold if x(t) is complex-valued?
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
> -L


In the thread "Nyquist rate for sampling complex-valued data?" starting at 12 November this item was
discussed already. You may find some answers there.

Jeroen
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-30-2004, 12:32 PM
Séb
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: question about lowest sampling rate...

Hi,

If x(t) is real, then the spectrum is symetric. So for example, you can
multiply x(t) by a complex exponential with frequency B/2 and then low
pass filter with bandwidth B/2. Then sampling at Fs=B is enough.

If it is complex you need to sample at Fs=2B

I don't understand why you think x(t)^3 can be sampled at Fs=2B instead of
Fs=6B? Unless x(t) as special properties...

Séb



Hi all,
>
>Suppose x(t) has bandwith bandlimited in [-B, B]... so the lowest

sampling
>rate for x(t) is Fs=2B...
>
>Does this matter when x(t) is real or complex-valued?
>
>Moreover, for (x(t))^2, the bandwidth is [-2B, 2B], the lowest Fs=4B no
>matter when x(t) is real or complex-valued. Am I right?
>
>More interestingly, for (x(t))^3, the bandwidth is [-3B, 3B], but we can


>still use Fs=2B(the same as x(t))... if x(t) is real-valued... Am I

right?
>Does this result hold if x(t) is complex-valued?
>
>Thanks a lot!
>
>-L
>
>
>




This message was sent from http://www.DSPRelated.com
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-01-2004, 10:50 AM
Séb
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: question about lowest sampling rate...

Sorry, just to correct as I must have confused myself.

if x(t) is real, then the spectrum is symetric (in power, but the phase is
the conjugate). But it still need to be sampled to Fs=2B.

If x(t) is complex, then it needs to be sampled at Fs=2B too. Then it
spectrum is not symetric, and the samples are complex (which takes twice
as much room to store than id x(t) was real).

Séb


Hi,
>
>If x(t) is real, then the spectrum is symetric. So for example, you can
>multiply x(t) by a complex exponential with frequency B/2 and then low
>pass filter with bandwidth B/2. Then sampling at Fs=B is enough.
>
>If it is complex you need to sample at Fs=2B
>
>I don't understand why you think x(t)^3 can be sampled at Fs=2B instead

of
>Fs=6B? Unless x(t) as special properties...
>
>Séb
>
>
>
>Hi all,
>>
>>Suppose x(t) has bandwith bandlimited in [-B, B]... so the lowest

>sampling
>>rate for x(t) is Fs=2B...
>>
>>Does this matter when x(t) is real or complex-valued?
>>
>>Moreover, for (x(t))^2, the bandwidth is [-2B, 2B], the lowest Fs=4B no


>>matter when x(t) is real or complex-valued. Am I right?
>>
>>More interestingly, for (x(t))^3, the bandwidth is [-3B, 3B], but we

can
>
>>still use Fs=2B(the same as x(t))... if x(t) is real-valued... Am I

>right?
>>Does this result hold if x(t) is complex-valued?
>>
>>Thanks a lot!
>>
>>-L
>>
>>
>>

>
>
>
> This message was sent from http://www.DSPRelated.com
>




This message was sent from http://www.DSPRelated.com
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 12-02-2004, 09:50 PM
David Kirkland
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: question about lowest sampling rate...

Lucy,

lucy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Suppose x(t) has bandwith bandlimited in [-B, B]... so the lowest sampling
> rate for x(t) is Fs=2B...
>
> Does this matter when x(t) is real or complex-valued?


Correct, Fs=2B whether x(t) is real or complex. The resulting samples
would correspondingly be real and complex.

>
> Moreover, for (x(t))^2, the bandwidth is [-2B, 2B], the lowest Fs=4B no
> matter when x(t) is real or complex-valued. Am I right?


Correct.

>
> More interestingly, for (x(t))^3, the bandwidth is [-3B, 3B], but we can
> still use Fs=2B(the same as x(t))... if x(t) is real-valued... Am I right?
> Does this result hold if x(t) is complex-valued?


Nope. Fs = 6B i.e. 2* 3B.

What usually confuses people is the definition of Bandwidth in real and
complex sampling. In your first example ,with a real signal, the
bandwidth is sometimes said to be B (not 2B) (No pun intended). The
thing to remember is that the sample rate = the full bandwidth , by full
I mean including the negative frequency range.

Cheers,
David
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
how to decide a good sampling rate for sampling a function without obvious frequency? lucy DSP 11 08-19-2004 05:57 AM
Question about sampling rate in adaptive antenna? Jeff DSP 0 10-06-2003 05:07 PM
Re: choosing a sampling rate lesser than nyquist rate(sub nyquist rate) Ian DSP 2 07-10-2003 09:35 AM
Re: choosing a sampling rate lesser than nyquist rate(sub nyquist rate) jim DSP 0 07-09-2003 01:46 AM
Re: choosing a sampling rate lesser than nyquist rate(sub nyquistrate) robert bristow-johnson DSP 0 07-08-2003 05:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright 2008 @ FPGA Central. All rights reserved