FPGA Central - World's 1st FPGA / CPLD Portal

FPGA Central

World's 1st FPGA Portal

 

Go Back   FPGA Groups > NewsGroup > DSP

DSP comp.dsp newsgroup, mailing list

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2007, 03:44 PM
[email protected]
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default QAM and Gardner synchronization

Hi,


I would like to knwow if the QPSK Gardner algorithm for symbol
recovery works too for QAM or MPSK signals ?

Thanks

Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2007, 05:40 PM
mk
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: QAM and Gardner synchronization

On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 06:44:20 -0700, [email protected]
wrote:

>Hi,
>
>
>I would like to knwow if the QPSK Gardner algorithm for symbol
>recovery works too for QAM or MPSK signals ?
>
>Thanks


As number of levels increase the self-noise of the ted becomes worse.
Gardner is mainly useful for a binary signal but can be used for lower
M levels with not too low SNR.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2007, 03:16 PM
[email protected]
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: QAM and Gardner synchronization

if gardner can't works for QAM what kind of symbol synchronisation
could we use for QAM ?

Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2007, 09:17 PM
John
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: QAM and Gardner synchronization

On Sep 20, 9:16 am, fpga.vhdl.desig...@gmail.com wrote:
> if gardner can't works for QAM what kind of symbol synchronisation
> could we use for QAM ?


You could try applying a nonlinearity such as abs(), sqrt() or half
bit delay-conjugate multiply to the data. This produces a discrete
component at the symbol rate, which can be bandpass filtered to
provide a symbol clock reference.

John

Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-2007, 04:14 PM
Steve Underwood
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: QAM and Gardner synchronization

[email protected] wrote:
> if gardner can't works for QAM what kind of symbol synchronisation
> could we use for QAM ?


Who said it can't work? As long as the excess bandwidth is more than
something like 25%, it works quite well. Problems occur with narrowing
bandwidth, so it certainly can't work for some people.

Where Gardner it won't work various things are possible, You could try
something like cross-correlating the outputs from two narrow bandpass
filters centred at the band edges.

Steve

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A Question about Gardner TED peugeot888 DSP 13 06-28-2007 02:09 PM
Coarse synchronization & fine synchronization in OFDM Aymen++ DSP 2 09-15-2006 10:46 AM
Are symbol synchronization and frame synchronization the same? Ant_Magma DSP 5 12-29-2005 05:42 PM
Gardner TED and intepolator Rajenish_jain DSP 0 10-05-2005 08:28 AM
Gardner TED rider DSP 8 04-22-2004 01:07 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright 2008 @ FPGA Central. All rights reserved