Randy Yates wrote:

> Nuclear is not a long-term viable solution.

More looks like nuclear is the only viable solution.

> We still haven't come
> anywhere close to a good long-term solution for nuclear waste.

You'd better get used to it.

> What we SHOULD be doing (and should HAVE been doing for 40 years) is
> channeling more funding into fusion (say, 1/10th the amount we've fed
> wars in the last 40 years?). Once we crack that nut, no one will ever
> worry about energy again.

Isn't 60 years of research enough to recognize and acknowledge that
fusion does not work?


Vladimir Vassilevsky
DSP and Mixed Signal Design Consultant
http://www.abvolt.com