Re: regarding zero padding and Cyclic prefix
On Jun 17, 8:44*pm, Porterboy 76 <porterbo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > One more thing ,in a particular system 64 pt IFFT/FFT was taken .in
> > which 52 were carriers(48 data + 4 pilots) rest were zeros.
> > and 16 CP.
>
> This is from the IEEE 802.11 Standard.
ya but i want to know whats the advantage of padding zeros .
|