On May 27, 10:03*am, "MikeWhy" <boat042-nos...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I really did mean explicitly .xise, as opposed to .ise. It's apparently new
> with 11.1. It looks like well formed XML, but I didn't look in any detail..
> The .ise file looks to be a TCL script, likely generated from .xise.

Ok - sorry for the confusion. This sounds useful, although we haven't
upgraded to 11.1 just yet. I'll definitely keep it in mind when we do.
Thanks for the info.