View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 10:07 PM
Rune Allnor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: matched filter before interpolator

On 19 Feb, 21:52, dbd <d...@ieee.org> wrote:
> On Feb 19, 9:29 am, Rune Allnor <all...@tele.ntnu.no> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 19 Feb, 18:10, dbd <d...@ieee.org> wrote:

>
> > > On Feb 19, 4:15 am, Rune Allnor <all...@tele.ntnu.no> wrote:

>
> > > > On 7 Feb, 17:43, "Pavel.Schu...@gmail.com" <Pavel.Schu...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:

>
> > > > > *What is the impulse response
> > > > > of fiter matched for example with rectangular transmit filter *or
> > > > > raised cosine filter in that case?
> > > > Window functions in a matched filter? That's a new one.
> > > > How does that work?
> > > > Rune

>
> > > If the signal was generated by windowing, as all finite signals are,
> > > don't you try to match the window?

>
> > Not explicitly. The way I know the matched filter, you
> > try and match the impulse response. How the impulse is
> > found is a separate issue. If a non-rectangular window
> > function was used somewhere it would be part of the
> > impulse response already and not need explicit handling.

>
> > Rune

>
> Rune
>
> *You are the only one to suggest any explicit handling of windowing.


You are right. I didn't understand (and still don't) why and
how the terms 'rectangular' or 'raised cosine' appear in
a discussion about matched filters. Are these impulse repsonses
or transfer functions?

Rune
Reply With Quote