Jerry Avins wrote:
> Stan Pawlukiewicz wrote:
>
>> Jerry Avins wrote:
>
>
> ...
>
>>> Only theories that can generate testable predictions are properly
>>> subjects of science.
>>
>>
>> How about string theory?
>
>
> String theory is now in its infancy. People find it interesting and are
> exploring its ramifications. If none of that leads ultimately to a
> testable prediction, it will fade away.
>
> Jerry

So it should not be mentioned in any public school science class,
because it really isn't a science yet. It might be interpreted as the
establishment of a pasta deity.