Thread: OT: Evidence
View Single Post
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 12-21-2005, 08:32 PM
Stan Pawlukiewicz
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: OT: Evidence

Jerry Avins wrote:
> Randy Yates wrote:
>
>> Donald wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Randy Yates wrote:
>>>
>>>> Stanley emitted the following keycodes:
>>>
>>>
>>>>> IMHO you really can't completely separate science from philosophy.
>>>
>>>
>>>> I agree 100 percent!
>>>
>>>
>>>> --RY
>>>
>>>
>>> Can someone please explain to me why this "creation" is so important.

>>
>>
>>
>> [That's a question, not a statement.]
>>
>> Are you responding to me, or was my post just a convenient place for
>> you to ask a question?
>>
>> If you are responding to me, then I claim your question is a
>> non-sequitur to my comment. Either creationist or
>> evolutionist could make this claim.

>
>
> <nit_pick_mode> I doubt that science can exist without philosophy, but
> do you claim that all philosophies are in some sense scientific?
> I think, therefor I do science? </nit_pick_mode>


I think that if a philosopher understood the way Galileo trumped
Aristolean reasoning, that would in some way influence their thought.
I don't think Nietzsche was scientific so if you count him as a
philosopher, the answer is no.

>
> Jerry

Reply With Quote