Bryan Hackney wrote:

> robert bristow-johnson wrote:
> > in article 9S4qf.3035$[email protected], Bryan Hackney at
> > [email protected] wrote on 12/20/2005 23:28:
> >
> >
> >>ID and macro-evolution should both be hauled to the trash heap. They have
> >>exactly the same amount of physical evidence in support.
> >
> >
> > oh really? i didn't know that "macro"-evolution required the establishment
> > of a deity, something kinda hard to measure with scientific instruments.
> > the *theory* of (macro|micro|whatever) Darwinian evolution and natural
> > selection has holes in the fossil record, unanswered questions, and parts
> > that will be revised in the future (meaning those parts, now generally
> > accepted are *wrong*), but its amount of physical evidence is not zero.
>
> Species jumping evidence is very close to if not zero. If it were not,
> we would know about it, because the evolution proponents are desparate to
> keep their religion (sic) afloat. It may be a religion without a diety,
> but it requires no more faith than your garden variety deity based
> religion.

You mean "no less faith". Yes, well, the more things change the more they stay
the same.

-jim

> > until some scientist makes a "God-detector", ID and Creationism have *zero*
> > physical evidence.
> >


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----