robert bristow-johnson wrote:
> in article 9S4qf.3035$[email protected], Bryan Hackney at
> [email protected] wrote on 12/20/2005 23:28:
>
>
>>ID and macro-evolution should both be hauled to the trash heap. They have
>>exactly the same amount of physical evidence in support.
>
>
> oh really? i didn't know that "macro"-evolution required the establishment
> of a deity, something kinda hard to measure with scientific instruments.
> the *theory* of (macro|micro|whatever) Darwinian evolution and natural
> selection has holes in the fossil record, unanswered questions, and parts
> that will be revised in the future (meaning those parts, now generally
> accepted are *wrong*), but its amount of physical evidence is not zero.

Species jumping evidence is very close to if not zero. If it were not,
we would know about it, because the evolution proponents are desparate to
keep their religion (sic) afloat. It may be a religion without a diety,
but it requires no more faith than your garden variety deity based
religion.


> until some scientist makes a "God-detector", ID and Creationism have *zero*
> physical evidence.
>