robert bristow-johnson wrote:
> in article 9S4qf.3035$[email protected], Bryan Hackney at
> [email protected] wrote on 12/20/2005 23:28:
>
>
>>ID and macro-evolution should both be hauled to the trash heap. They have
>>exactly the same amount of physical evidence in support.
>
>
> oh really? i didn't know that "macro"-evolution required the establishment
> of a deity, something kinda hard to measure with scientific instruments.
> the *theory* of (macro|micro|whatever) Darwinian evolution and natural
> selection has holes in the fossil record, unanswered questions, and parts
> that will be revised in the future (meaning those parts, now generally
> accepted are *wrong*), but its amount of physical evidence is not zero.
> until some scientist makes a "God-detector", ID and Creationism have *zero*
> physical evidence.
>
Kind of depends on your viewpoint. One could argue that all of creation
is evidence.